You seem to have a shallow understanding on race and it's perception of it, especially in the Jewish sense. It's nothing obvious, so I hope you don't take offense to that statement. I'm not blaming you for not having it.
Now, in the 1940's, no one really knew anything about modern biology, genetics, or ethnic theory. They had racial theory - that there was a white race, a black race, a Mongoloid race, etc. Jews were also a race - the "racial other".
This view was certainly held in popular belief throughout must of the world. In America yes, but more so in Europe. Make no mistake: At this time, Jews were believed by everyone, physicians and respectable scientists included, to be so racially different that you couldn't really call them white.
Btw, race and the theory of it is scientific hogwash. Race doesn't exist outside of the human race, and it was created to justify one perceived race's dominance over the other. Not race, but just a group. Skin color was chosen because it was the most obvious thing. Why couldn't it be eye color instead? Basically, race is baloney.
Now, given that, what's to stop the Jews from rejecting that IF THEY WERE RECEIVING THE FULL BLUNT OF IT. They didn't know better than many of the scientists at the time who still accepted the theory of race, and it made no difference in how they were treated. That, and the fact that, while Judaism is a religion, there is the fact that most Jews of this time were descended from ethnic groups that were practically exclusively Jewish.
Now, at this time, it's becoming clear about what truths concerning race are. This guy is one example. However, concerning your condemnation of certain Zionists and their views towards race: Now, it would be a horrendous mistake; but, then, it was something to consider. At least, if the Jews as a whole rejected the notion, it wouldn't stop them from being treated as such. Case and point would be the Nazis, who saw them as so racially other that they were contamination and had to be dealt with.
Today, Zionists really aren't trying to say that. Maybe some might argue ethnicity, which is valid, but race is something that is invalid, and quite honestly I don't remember any Zionist that I've heard raise his point as a racial one. At least, I would hope that those who argue "race" mean ethnicity, since there is also the problem that the two, while similar concepts, are not actually the same.
So, NO.